« It's official: journalists are miserable | Main | New Case Study Alert Service »

February 09, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345202e469e200e55031b94f8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nice Social Media Release, shame about the content:

» February 29: Jos PR Top 5 from Strive Notes
Another week, another list of my top five’s… 1. Apparently there are five different types of UK social networker. I am a cynical clown, which one are you? Take the test on Real Buzz and find out… 2. PR stands for public relations although some se... [Read More]

Comments

Interesting post Sally.

I suspect a large part of the problem you identify here is that many PR agencies actually don't have specialist agencies, or even anyone who fully understands social media.

So you end up with digital agencies that understand the technology of the SMR, and then PR agencies that understand the release/story aspect of the SMR, but it's still a challenge to put the two together.

I agree, though, that given the amount of money being invested in the PR industry's social media research and high-profile hires, it's kinda surprising we don't have more actual social media releases, isn't it?

The most effective and worthwhile online and offline media coverage I have secured in recent times has been generated by making individual approaches to journalists, specifically targeted to their interests and audiences. It's true that PR agencies need to use the most up to date communications tools (such as social media releases) and that there are benefits to using this format for news. I think it's good to remember, though, that a release is a tool and it is how it is used that counts; what distinguishes PR from marketing or advertising is the tailored approach that PROs can offer. This targeted approach cannot be achieved by a release being issued in a scattergun fashion, no matter how gorgeous (or should that be delicious?) its format.

Carole

You make a brilliant point - only today I had lunch with two journalist colleagues and one of them pointed out they hadn't written a story off the back of a news release in the last 12 months. The second journalist had written one such story.

That said, I do often use press releases as background and a research tool and a format that is more user-friendly can only make that process easier for me.

The press release is dead. It should be confined to the office bin along with the tie.

I've just come back from Mobile World Congress and had something of an epiphany... it's all about 1-2-1 interaction, with the trick being to get the right information, in the right format to the right person at the right time, and the press release is probably just about the worse way to do that.

Of course, clients wont stop asking for them anytime soon, but us PROs can start changing the way we write and distribute them so that they become information sheets rather than para after para of meaningless guff.

I used to beam with pride when I wrote a quote for a CEO in a release that got approved with few if any changes. Now I cringe.

Ideas + delivery are the core 2.0 PR skills. Within that comes relationship building and strong writing, but the "broadcast to many mentality" is on its way out.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Recent Comments